How do we preach from the Old Testament in ways that avoid anti-Judaism? In this latest blogpost for our Sunday Sermon Monday Mourning series, Revd Robert Parkinson reflects on the question.

Photo by KaLisa Veer on Unsplash

Advent and Christmas provide rich occasions for preaching and worship. Readings, hymns, songs, and sermons combine to paint beautiful and emotive pictures of the advent of the eternal Word made flesh. Still, I wonder how many Christians are aware of an inherent anti-Judaism often hidden in festive garb. I wonder too whether we preachers inadvertently perpetuate anti-Jewish ideas in our Advent preaching. In focusing on this danger, I hope to offer some help to all who would seek to preach good news without becoming bad news to their Jewish neighbours.

So, what are the problems with Advent preaching? First, the Advent and Christmas seasons proclaim the coming of Jesus into the world as light into darkness. This is well and good, except that, sometimes, preachers imply that Jesus came to bring a new religion or movement (Christianity) to replace an old, misguided, and unsatisfactory one (Judaism). It ought to be obvious that such representation is blatant anti-Judaism and is incorrect at every level. Regrettably, however, it persists in some Christian pronouncements even today.

A more subtle and perhaps therefore more prevalent problem arises from the theme of promise and fulfilment that predominates in the season of Advent. This theme is often presented as if various passages of the Old Testament clearly predict the events of the New Testament, particularly the coming of Jesus. The unspoken implication is that anyone who does not see the clear predictions must be blind, obstinate, or stupid. Such an implication is not only unkind. It is exactly the way Jews have been portrayed in anti-Semitic tropes throughout the centuries. For, Judaism does not find a witness to Jesus in the Hebrew Bible that is jointly read as Scripture by both Jews and Christians. Furthermore, it turns out that the Jewish way of reading is at least as valid as the Christian way.

Take, for example, Isaiah 7.14. In the King James version it reads, “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” Sound familiar? Of course. Matthew’s Gospel uses it to conclude the story of the birth of Jesus. “All this took place to fulfil what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet: ‘Look the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call him Emmanuel’, which means, ‘God is with us.’” (Matt 1.22-23).

Photo attribution: Nuttgens, Joseph. Immanuel — Behold a Virgin Shall Conceive…, from Art in the Christian Tradition, a project of the Vanderbilt Divinity Library, Nashville, TN. https://diglib.library.vanderbilt.edu/act-imagelink.pl?RC=56229 [retrieved November 3, 2021]. Original source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/paullew/2838876113.

However, a closer look at Isaiah 7 reveals a problem. The passage clearly does not refer to anything in the far distant future but speaks to the real, social, and political circumstances faced by people of Judah in the eighth century BCE.

A simple comparison between the AV and NRSV translations alerts us to some of the issues. NRSV reads, ‘Look, the young woman is with child and shall bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel.’ Where the AV speaks of a virgin who shall conceive, the NRSV, reflecting the original Hebrew  more accurately, speaks of a ‘young woman’ who ‘is (already) with child’. The passage is not actually interested in the virginity of the young woman, nor does it foretell a virgin birth.

When we read the entire chapter, it becomes evident that Isaiah is urging the King of Judah to trust God rather than fear the Kingdoms of Israel and Syria who are arrayed against him. Isaiah offers a sign. By the time a pregnant woman gives birth, and the child reaches the age of two, Israel and Syria will cease to be a threat, because the Assyrians will have routed them in war.

So, was Matthew’s Gospel wrong to find a promise of the birth of Jesus in Isaiah 7? Not necessarily. Matthew’s Gospel employs a method of interpretation commonly employed in Second Temple Judaism. Matthew found a new, hidden meaning in the text of Isaiah, much as both Jews and Christians have found spiritual meaning in, say, the Song of Solomon, which clearly began its life simply as a beautiful love song. There would be no problem with Matthew if we allowed it to convey one among many ways of reading Isaiah and if we read Isaiah more seriously, allowing its original meaning also to stand.

In Mark 10.28-35 Jesus encounters a scribe who questions him about the most important commandment. In contrast to Matthew and Luke, Mark presents this encounter in entirely positive terms. Mark’s scribe is not out to test Jesus. Instead, he engages in a good-faith conversation. Indeed, he gets a speaking part equal in length to that of Jesus. The two affirm each other even though the scribe shows no inclination to become a disciple of Jesus. They agree that the most important commandment is to love God with one’s whole being and to love one’s neighbour as oneself. In this passage Jesus exemplifies how we might relate, in genuine respect, to those with whom we may not agree on everything but with whom we have much in common.

So, how might the Christian preacher develop a greater sensitivity toward Jews and Judaism? These are my suggestions:

1) Imagine that the rabbi of your nearest synagogue is seated on the front row whenever you preach.

2) Do use the Old Testament in your preaching, but always read the text, in its context and with the aid of a good, critical commentary.

3) Get some help. In addition to the critical commentaries, I recommend the following:

Allen, Ronald J. and Clark M. Williamson. Preaching the Gospels without Blaming the Jews: A Lectionary Commentary. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.

Levine, Amy-Jill and Marc Zvi Brettler, eds. The Jewish Annotated New Testament. New Revised Standard Version Bible Translation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Mayfield, Tyler D. Unto Us a Child Is Born: Isaiah, Advent, and Our Jewish Neighbors. Eerdmans, 2020.

I hope that this Advent, Christian preachers everywhere will refuse to perpetuate anti-Judaism as they proclaim the gospel of God’s love and peace.

Robert Parkinson is minister of Didsbury Baptist Church, Manchester. He is a keen student of the Old Testament and has particular interest and experience in Jewish-Christian relations. Guest blogs are invited to stimulate discussion and comment and should not be assumed to represent the views of the Centre for the Study of Bible and Violence.

Avoiding Advent Anti-Judaism

2 thoughts on “Avoiding Advent Anti-Judaism

  • 5th November 2021 at 11:22 am
    Permalink

    Anti-semitism and anti-Judaism are clearly wrong. Those both inside and outside the church body who hold such views need to be educated and gently corrected.

    That said, it´s my understanding that the earliest Jewish followers of Jesus Christ who experienced Jesus´ rise from the dead began to rethink everything they saw and read in their Hebrew scriptures. That´s the reason they saw Jesus Christ in those scriptures in places that Jewish people still do not even today. Even on the road to Emmaus in Luke´s gospel, Jesus showed the travelers where he was present in the Hebrew scriptures and how they point to him.

    I want to be as humble and gentle as I can with my Jewish neighbors realizing all they have been through historically as a people. On the other hand, I cannot hold back from boldly declaring Jesus Christ as Immanuel, God with us. Especially during the season Advent and Christmas.

    Reply
  • 11th November 2021 at 10:42 am
    Permalink

    I can’t entirely agree with Robert here. There is a simple logical problem – if Jesus is the Jewish ‘Messiah’, combining in his person the Davidic and Divine kingships over Israel, then Jews who reject that are effectively in rebellion against God. Jesus’ church/‘ekklesia’ is the continuation of the Old Testament ‘congregation’ of the people of Israel (the LXX Greek uses the word ‘ekklesia’ for that concept) and logically Jews attempting to continue a separate Jewish people of God are setting themselves outside the one and only ‘ekklesia’. God cannot logically have two ‘peoples’ of which one (the Christians) is international and pacifist and the other narrowly nationalist and physically fighting to establish very much a ‘kingdom of this world’ in Israel such as Jesus explicitly rejected. And – often overlooked in a proper concern over anti-semitic racism – that continuing Judaism is on the face of it often guilty of what amounts to pro-Jewish racism on their side.

    Christians and ‘continuing Jews’ will disagree. The really virulent kind of anti-semitism largely derives from the period starting in the 300sCE of there being so-called ‘Christian states’ which persecuted Jews along with other non-Christians and also dissenting Christians. One of the most useful things we can do for Jewish/Christian relations is to finally abandon that ‘Christian state’ idea and accept the NT teaching in which Christians themselves are ‘resident aliens’ world-wide and emphatically international, pacifist, and anti-racist.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

fifteen − fifteen =